Social comparison and coping among cancer patients
Abstract
Social comparison, refers to relating one´s own situation to that of others. This article presents an overview of our research program on social comparison strategies among patients with many different types of cancer. A variety of paradigms was used, including experiments, diary studies, survey studies, computer facilitated studies, and intervention studies. Social comparisons are quite common among cancer patients, because they are often confronted with anxiety, stress, and uncertainties. Patients may compare themselves with others better off (upward comparisons), for example others who have a better prognosis, and with others worse off (downward comparisons), for example others who have a worse prognosis. Overall, upward comparisons tend to be preferred and to contribute more to well-being than downward comparisons. However, the effects of social comparison on well-being depend to an important extent on whether the focus is on identification (looking for similarities with the comparison target), or on contrast (using the other as a standard to evaluate one´s own situation). Especially upward identification and downward contrast tend to have positive effects on well-being, and to be associated with active coping. The preferences for, and the effects of, social comparison are to a lato a large extent dependent on Social Comparison Orientation (SCO), i.e., the dispositional tendency to engage in social comparisons, and on Neuroticism, with individuals high in this trait responding more negatively to particularly upward comparison. Intervention studies based on social comparisons, in which cancer patients receive audiotaped bogus interviews with other cancer patients, show that exposure to others coping well has long-term positive effects on quality of life especially for those high in SCO. The effects of exposure to patients talking about their emotional experiences are mixed, and even negative for those high in Neuroticism. However, audiotaped social comparison information may have especially positive effects for those who experience their cancer as very threatening.
Downloads
References
2. Brakel, T.M., Dijkstra, A. & Buunk, A.P. (2012). Effects of the source of social comparison information on former cancer patients' quality of life. British Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 667 681.
3. Brakel, T. M., Dijkstra, A., & Buunk, A. P. (2014). Targeting cancer patients’ quality of life through social comparison: a randomized trial. Psychology and Health, 29, 950-966.
4. Buunk, A.P., Bennenbroek, F.T.C., Stiegelis, H., Sanderman, R., Brakel, T.M., Van den Bergh, A.C.M., & Hagedoorn, M. (2009). Neuroticism and responses to social comparison among cancer patients. European Journal of Personality, 23, 475-487.
5. Buunk, A.P., Bennenbroek, F.T.C., Stiegelis, H.E., Van den Bergh, A.C.M., Sanderman, R., & Hagedoorn, M. (2011). Follow-up effects of social comparison information on the quality of life of cancer patients: The moderating role of social comparison orientation. Psychology & Health, 27, 1-14.
6. Buunk, A.P., Dijkstra, P.D., & Bosma, H.A. (2020). Changes in Social Comparison Orientation over the lifespan. Journal of Clinical and Developmental Psychology, 2, 1-11.
7. Buunk, A.P., Dijkstra, P.D., Gibbons, F.X., & Krizan, Z. (2019). Individual differences in social comparison: The complex effects of Social Comparison Orientation. In J. Suls, R.L. Collins & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Social comparison in judgment and behavior (pp. 77-105) New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8. Castellini, G., Merola, G. P., Boy, O. B., Pecoraro, V., Bozza, B., Cassioli, E., Rossi, E., Bessi, V., Sorbi, S., Nacmias, B., & Ricca, V. (2023). Emotional dysregulation, alexithymia and neuroticism: A systematic review on the genetic basis of a subset of psychological traits. Psychiatric Genetics, 33(3), 79–101.
9. Dijkstra, P.D., Buunk, A.P. & Barelds, D. (in press). In J. Maddux (Ed.). Subjective well-being and life satisfaction: A social psychological perspective. Routledge.
10. Guan, T., Santacroce, S. J., Chen, D., & Song, L. (2020). Illness uncertainty, coping, and quality of life among patients with prostate cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 29(6), 1019–1025.
11. Gürel, Ç., Brummelman, E., & Overbeek, G. (2022). Proudly moving forward and feeling connected: Adolescents’ daily temporal comparisons relate to a desire for growth and sense of relatedness. Emotion, 22(6), 1224–1238.
12. Habib, M., Borst, G., Poirel, N., Houdé, O., Moutier, S., & Cassotti, M. (2015). Socio‐emotional context and adolescents' decision making: The experience of regret and relief after social comparison. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25, 81-91.
13. Klein, W. M. P., & Rice, E. L. (2020). Health cognitions, decision-making, and behavior: The ubiquity of social comparison. In J. Suls, R. L. Collins, & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Social comparison, judgment, and behavior (pp. 527–574). Oxford University Press.
14. Maharaj, N., Soheilipour, S., Bender, J. L., & Kazanjian, A. (2021). Understanding prostate cancer patients’ support needs: How do they manage living with cancer? Illness, Crisis, & Loss, 29(1), 51–73.
15. Meier, A., Gilbert, A., Börner, S., & Possler, D. (2020). Instagram inspiration: How upward comparison on social network sites can contribute to well-being. Journal of Communication, 70(5), 721–743.
16. Sharpe, L., Michalowski, M., Richmond, B., Menzies, R. E., & Shaw, J. (2023). Fear of progression in chronic illnesses other than cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a transdiagnostic construct. Health Psychology Review, 17(2), 301–320.
17. Taylor, S.E., Buunk, B.P., & Aspinwall, L.G. (1990). Social comparison, stress, and coping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 74-89.
18. Van der Zee, K.I., Buunk, B.P., De Ruiter, J.H., Tempelaar, R., Van Sonderen, E., & Sanderman, R. (1996) Social comparison and the subjective well-being of cancer patients. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 453-468.
19. Van der Zee, K., Buunk, B.P., & Sanderman, R. (1998). Neuroticism and reactions to social comparison information among cancer patients. Journal of Personality, 66, 175-194.
20. Van der Zee, K., Buunk, B.P., Sanderman, R., Botke, G., & Van den Berg, F. (1999). The big five and identification- processes in social comparison in adjustment to cancer treatment. European Journal of Personality, 13, 307-326.
21. Van der Zee, K., Buunk, B.P., Sanderman, R., Botke, G., & Van den Berg, F. (2000). Social comparison and coping with cancer treatment. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 17-34.
22. Van der Zee, K.I., Buunk, B.P., Wheeler, R., Sanderman, R., Van den Berg, A., & De Jong, M. (1996). A diary study on naturally occurring social comparison processes among patients with Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin's disease. Psycho-oncology, 5(2), 204.
23. Van der Zee, K.I., Oldersma, F.L., & Buunk, B.P. & Bos, D.A.J. (19¬98). Social comparison preferences among cancer patients as related to neuroticism and social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 801-810.
