Emotional and semantic analysis of economic security discourse narratives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59476/mtt2025.v3i21.742Keywords:
economic security, emotional framing, media discourse, semantic analysisAbstract
This article examines how Lithuanian online media from 2020 to 2024 constructs narratives of economic security through emotional and semantic forms of expression. The issue is grounded in the observation that financial security in the public sphere is increasingly represented not only through factual indicators but also through linguistic, emotional, and visual structures that shape collective perceptions of (in)security. Despite the growing role of media in regulating the emotional climate, there is a lack of systematic research in Lithuania that reveals how emotions and metaphors influence the logic of discourse and citizen responses. This study aims to analyse how narratives of economic security are formed in Lithuanian media through emotional and semantic expression. A mixed-methods approach is applied, combining thematic narrative analysis, emotion classification, latent semantic analysis (LSA), and the principles of critical discourse analysis (CDA). Data were collected from three major news portals: Delfi, 15min, and LRT. Articles were selected based on thematic keywords (“crisis,” “security,” “threat,” “inflation”) and analysed both quantitatively and qualitatively. The visualisation of emotion frequency was performed using the Python environment. The results revealed five dominant emotions — fear, anxiety, anger, trust, and hope — along with their dynamics in relation to major crisis events. Emotions in the discourse are not random; they are structured through metaphors (“inflation front,” “crisis blow”), discursive oppositions (for example, security versus threat, state versus citizen), and recurring semantic cores. A comparative analysis of the portals highlighted stylistic differences: Delfi tends to use dramatization and affective rhetoric more frequently, 15min balances emotional urgency with analytical structure, while LRT adopts a tone of trust and hope. The study suggests that the economic security discourse in the media functions as a means of emotional governance, helping to shape civic expectations, reinforce representations of (in)security, and influence public responses to crises.
References
1. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage.
2. Bogdzevič, M. (2020). Pykčio, baimės ir gėdos jausmai lietuvių kalboje iš kognityvinės ir kultūrinės perspektyvos. Vilniaus universitetas. https://talpykla.elaba.lt/elaba-fedora/objects/elaba:72860393/datastreams/MAIN/content
3. Buzan, B. (2023). Making global society: a study of humankind across three eras. Cambridge University Press.
4. Cavaillé, C., & Neundorf, A. (2023). Elite cues and economic policy attitudes: the mediating role of economic hardship. Political Behavior, 45(4), 1355–1376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09768-w
5. Cook, H. D. (2021). Baltic responses: countering russian information warfare operations in the 21st century information, cyber, and psychological spaces. Vilniaus universitetas. https://epublications.vu.lt/object/elaba:193202688/index.html
6. Entman, R. M. (2009). Projections of power: framing news, public opinion, and U.S. Foreign policy. University of Chicago Press.
7. Fairclough, N. (2018). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
8. Flam, H. (2015). Introduction: Methods of exploring emotions. In Methods of Exploring Emotions (1–22). Routledge. https://discovered.ed.ac.uk/permalink/44UOE_INST/iatqhp/alma9924032636902466
9. Giddens, A. (1996). The Consequences of Modernity. Polity Press.
10. Grigienė, E. (2025). Komunikacija krizės metu ir jos įtaka organizacijos reputacijos išsaugojimui. Vilniaus universitetas. https://epublications.vu.lt/object/elaba:229581960/index.html
11. Gross, J. J. (2024). Conceptual foundations of emotion regulation. In J. J. Gross & B. Ford (Eds.), Handbook of Emotion Regulation (3–12). The Guilford Press.
12. Habermas, J. (2023). A new structural transformation of the public sphere and deliberative politics. John Wiley & Sons.
13. Hall, S. (2018). Essential essays, Volume 1: Foundations of cultural studies. Duke University Press.
14. Jasper, J. M. (2014). Protest: A cultural introduction to social movements. John Wiley & Sons.
15. Kalinauskaitė, K. (2017). Politikų komunikacija socialiniuose tinkluose: sociolingvistinis aspektas. Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas. https://www.vdu.lt/cris/entities/etd/68adc30e-9aab-45ee-b3cc-4333d0674517
16. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2020). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. In Shaping Entrepreneurship Research (475–504). Routledge. https://cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/575/F01/lakoff.johnson80.pdf
17. Misztal, B. (2013). Trust in modern societies: The search for the bases of social order. John Wiley & Sons.
18. Nabi, R. L., & Myrick, J. G. (2019). Uplifting Fear Appeals: considering the role of hope in fear-based persuasive messages. Health Communication, 34(4), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1422847
19. O’Neill, S., & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2009). “Fear Won’t Do It”: promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30(3), 355–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008329201
20. Papacharissi, Z. (2021). After democracy: imagining our political future. Yale University Press.
21. Postman, N. (2005). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. Penguin.
22. Putnam, R. D. (2016). Our kids: the American dream in crisis. Simon & Schuster.
23. Scioli, A., & Biller, H. (2021). Hope in the age of anxiety. Oxford University Press.
24. Slater, M. D., Coleman, S., & Freiberger, N. (2024). Using the “Media as Mediator” approach to understand the influence of communication channel trust on COVID-19 protective behaviors: England, January 2022. Journal of Health Communication, 29(10), 635–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2024.2404912
25. Van Dijk, T. A. (2024). Discourse and ideologies of the radical right. Cambridge University Press.
26. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2020). An emotional turn in journalism studies? Digital Journalism, 8(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1697626
27. Wodak, R. (2021). The politics of fear: the shameless normalisation of far-right discourse. Sage.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Giedrė Paurienė

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.