Shared leadership and ai-enabled contingency planning in Ukrainian firms during the 2022–2025 war
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59476/mtt2026.v2i22.777Keywords:
shared leadership, contingency planning, crisis task forces, artificial intelligence, businessAbstract
The full-scale invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation, which began in February 2022, caused acute and long-term disruptions in the activities of Ukrainian companies, forcing them to quickly rebuild their organizational structures, decision-making mechanisms, and planning practices. This article offers a conceptual and analytical explanation of how wartime conditions accelerated the transition from centralised management measures to cross-functional crisis teams, shared leadership mechanisms and emerging learning operating models. This study is based on secondary data analysis and illustrative case studies, rather than original empirical research. It combines business survey data, institutional and corporate reports, and academic literature. On this basis, the article outlines an organizational trajectory from centralization to distributed cross-functional decision-making and beyond to what this study defines as a learning operating model. The article also highlights that AI-enabled practices (including situational dashboards, scenario modeling, demand forecasting, and knowledge management) supported by generative AI can accelerate collective situational awareness in wartime. However, role overload and coordination burdens can also increase in the absence of clarity of purpose. Thus, shared leadership in the study is viewed as potentially “a dual-effect organizational mechanism”. The conclusions outline the implications for Ukrainian business practices and compare the identified trajectories of organizational response of Ukrainian companies with future constraints associated with the European model of AI governance. This paper addresses a gap in the literature by establishing a link among shared leadership, contingency planning, and AI-based situational analysis in the specific context of business resilience in wartime. And its practical contribution is to identify organizational conditions under which AI tools can support distributed decision making without increasing coordination overhead.
References
1. AmCham Ukraine, & McKinsey & Company. (2022). Ukrainian business during the war: Survey of executive perspectives. American Chamber of Commerce in Ukraine.
2. Hart, P., & Boin, A. (2003). Public leadership in times of crisis: Mission impossible? Public Administration Review, 63(5), 544–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00318
3. Boin, A., Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2005). The politics of crisis management: Public leadership under pressure. Cambridge University Press.
4. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
5. Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217–1234. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159921
6. Chui, M., Hall, B., Singla, A., & Sukharevsky, A. (2023). The state of AI in 2023: Generative AI’s breakout year. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/quantumblack/our%20insights/the%20state%20of%20ai%20in%202023%20generative%20ais%20breakout%20year/the-state-of-ai-in-2023-generative-ais-breakout-year_vf.pdf
7. Davenport, T. H., & Mittal, N. (2023). All in on AI: How smart companies win big with artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review Press.
8. EBRD. (2022). EBRD regional economic prospects: War in Ukraine—Wider economic impact of the war. https://www.ebrd.com
9. EBRD. (2023). Ukraine economic assessment: Macroeconomic and structural review. https://www.ebrd.com
10. European Commission. (2021). Communication from the Commission on fostering a European approach to artificial intelligence. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu
11. European Commission. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts. Official Journal of the European Union. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai
12. European Commission. (2025). Ukraine 2025 report [Commission staff working document]. Directorate-General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/17115494-8122-4d10-8a06-2cf275eecde7_en?filename=ukraine-report-2025.pdf
13. European Commission AI Act Service Desk. (2024). Article 4: AI literacy. https://ai-act-service-desk.ec.europa.eu/en/ai-act/article-4
14. Faraj, S., & Xiao, Y. (2006). Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Science, 52(8), 1155–1169. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0526
15. Google. (2025, October 30). A vision for AI in government: How Ukraine is leading the way with AI in public services. Public Policy. https://publicpolicy.google/article/ukraine-ai-public-service/
16. Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619864925
17. Hao, M., Min, Y. A., Jie, L., & Yuling, D. (2025). The effect of shared leadership on employee resilience: Wielding the double-edged sword. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1441660. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1441660
18. Helfat, C. E., & Martin, J. A. (2015). Dynamic managerial capabilities: Review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1281–1312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314561301
19. Hjelle, S., Mikalef, P., Altwaijry, N., & Parida, V. (2024). Organizational decision making and analytics: An experimental study on dashboard visualizations. Information & Management, 61(6), 104011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2024.104011
20. IFC. (2022). Business pulse survey: Ukraine (Wave 1 and Wave 2). International Finance Corporation, World Bank Group. https://www.ifc.org
21. IFC. (2023). Business pulse survey: Ukraine (Wave 3 and Wave 4). International Finance Corporation, World Bank Group. https://www.ifc.org
22. International Organization for Standardization. (2023). ISO/IEC 42001:2023: Information technology- Artificial intelligence- Management system. https://www.iso.org/standard/42001
23. Kyivstar. (2023–2024). AI and data platform solutions [Official product pages and corporate communications]. https://kyivstar.ua
24. Nicolaides, V. C., LaPort, K. A., Chen, T. R., Tomassetti, A. J., Weis, E. J., Zaccaro, S. J., & Cortina, J. M. (2014). The shared leadership of teams: A meta-analysis of proximal, distal, and moderating relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 923–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.06.006
25. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.
26. OECD. (2022). Economic and social impact of the war against Ukraine. https://www.oecd.org
27. Sampson, C. (2025, November 7). Analysis: Ukraine’s agentic ambition: Building the world’s first AI state under fire. Kyiv Post. https://www.kyivpost.com/analysis/63856
28. Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 501–524. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392337
29. Te’eni, D., Raymond, M., Rowe, F., Thénoz, E., & Trimborn, P. (2026). Organizational learning for exploring generative AI: CORE-sandbox experiments. International Journal of Information Management, 87, 103029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2026.103029
30. Vogus, T. J., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Organizational resilience: Towards a theory and research agenda. In 2007 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (pp. 3418–3422). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2007.4414160
31. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications.
32. Wu, Y. L., Shao, B., Newman, A., & Schwarz, G. (2021). Crisis leadership: A review and future research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(6), 101518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101518
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Halyna Mishenina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
