Generative text as a challenge to creativity and academic ethics

Authors

  • Giedrė Paurienė Mykolas Romeris University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59476/mtt2026.v1i22.770

Keywords:

generative AI, academic integrity, ethical literacy, creativity, higher education

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools based on large language model (LLM) technology are transforming processes of creation, writing, and learning in higher education, raising questions about authorship, originality, and academic responsibility. Despite the growing body of research, existing studies mainly focus on regulation and plagiarism, while paying less attention to broader transformations in creativity and academic ethics. The aim of this article is to analyse how generative text reshapes the understanding of creative activity and academic ethics in educational and research contexts. The study adopts a qualitative, theoretical-analytical approach combining hermeneutic and discourse analysis. The analysis is based on three illustrative cases from language learning, translation practice, and academic writing, which are examined as analytical instances to explore emerging ethical and cultural tensions. The findings indicate that the key challenges associated with generative AI are primarily cultural and pedagogical rather than technological. Generative systems redistribute creative agency between human actors and algorithmic tools, transforming the role of the author into that of an editor, coordinator, and ethical decision-maker. While AI enhances productivity and linguistic accuracy, unreflective use risks diminishing interpretive depth, personal voice, and value-based reasoning. The results highlight the need to reconceptualise academic integrity as a reflective process-oriented practice and to develop educational frameworks that promote ethical literacy, transparency, and responsible authorship. The study contributes to the field by offering an integrative perspective that positions generative AI as a catalyst for rethinking creativity, authorship, and ethical responsibility in contemporary higher education.

References

1. Bittle, K., & El-Gayar, O. (2025). Generative AI and academic integrity in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Information, 16(4), 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040296

2. Bozkurt, A. (2024). GenAI et al.: Cocreation, Authorship, Ownership, Academic Ethics and Integrity in a Time of Generative AI. Open Praxis, 16(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.1.654

3. Cheng, A., Calhoun, A., & Reedy, G. (2025). Artificial intelligence-assisted academic writing: recommendations for ethical use. Advances in Simulation, 10, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00350-6

4. Deep, P. D., Edgington, W. D., Ghosh, N., & Rahaman, M. S. (2025). Evaluating the effectiveness and ethical implications of AI detection tools in higher education. Information, 16(10), 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16100905

5. Đerić, E., Frank, D., & Vuković, D. (2025). Exploring the ethical implications of using generative AI tools in higher education. Informatics, 12(2), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics12020036

6. Kofinas, A. K., Tsay, C. H. H., & Pike, D. (2025). The impact of generative AI on academic integrity of authentic assessments within a higher education context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56, 2522–2549. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13585

7. Meishar-Tal, H. (2025). Between technical assistance and authorship: Researchers’ ethical considerations of using generative AI for scientific writing. Ubiquity Proceedings, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/uproc.202

8. Pratiwi, H., Suherman, Hasruddin, & Ridha, M. (2025). Between shortcut and ethics: Navigating the use of artificial intelligence in academic writing among Indonesian doctoral students. European Journal of Education, 60(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70083

9. Watson, S., Brezovec, E., & Romic, J. (2025). The role of generative AI in academic and scientific authorship: an autopoietic perspective. AI & Society, 40, 3225–3235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02174-w

10. Yoo, J. H. (2025). Defining the boundaries of AI use in scientific writing: a comparative review of editorial policies. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 40(23). https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e187

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

Issue

Section

Socialinių mokslų tyrimai

How to Cite

Generative text as a challenge to creativity and academic ethics. (2026). Mokslo Taikomieji Tyrimai Applied Research, 1(22), 113-120. https://doi.org/10.59476/mtt2026.v1i22.770

Most read articles by the same author(s)