Match-fixing: socio-economic and psychological factors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59476/mtt2025.v2i21.729Keywords:
cheating, corruption, match-fixing, psychological, socio-economicAbstract
The topic of this article is Match-fixing: socio-economic and psychological drivers. The topic’s relevance lies within the core principle of sports: fair competition between teams or individual athletes. The research problem: what are the socio-economic and psychological factors that drive individuals to engage in match-fixing? Socio-economic and psychological factors were identified as the research’s object. The aim was to research and review relevant literature about cheating in sports, which would help define those driving factors. The research method used in this article is a literature review. Across the research, the most common reason for involvement in match-fixing was personal or financial gain. The second most common reason was to help others, either family, friends, or elders. Threats from gang members, peer pressure, and the commonality of such behavior in the environment were also mentioned as driving factors to get involved in match-fixing. Some scientific articles concluded that the older the athlete, the less the probability she or he has of being involved in match-fixing. On the contrary, other articles came to a different conclusion and stated that younger athletes have a higher chance of being involved. Moreover, while a certain article concluded that the athletes’ skill levels and justification of match-fixing do not correlate, another drew a conclusion saying that more successful athletes are less likely to engage in match-fixing activities. Some scientific articles considered differences between genders. It was found that Lithuanian men justify illegal behaviors more than women, and Australian men are more likely to be involved in corruption than women. However, this could be viewed as a universal trend, because no evidence of gender differences was found among other countries. Scientific articles stated that there is a gap in understanding the characteristics of people involved in match-fixing activities and a lack of studies based on testimonies and interviews with athletes who were involved in match-fixing or know someone who has been involved. Studies that would use primary research data mining methods to acquire first-hand observations, emotions, and knowledge could be beneficial to further examine socio-economic and psychological factors that drive individuals to engage in match-fixing and could help to better understand their characters.
References
1. Alam, M. S., Sultana, R., & Haque, M. A. (2022). Vulnerabilities of older adults and mitigation measures to address COVID-19 outbreak in Bangladesh: A review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100336
2. Alatas, V., Cameron, L., Chaudhuri, A., Erkal, N., & Gangadharan, L. (2009). Gender, culture, and corruption: Insights from an experimental analysis. Southern Economic Journal, 75(3), 663–680. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.2009.tb00925.x
3. Caneppele, S., Langlois, F., & Verschuuren, P. (2020). Those who counter match-fixing fraudsters: Voices from a multistakeholder ecosystem. Crime, Law and Social Change, 74(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-020-09889-z
4. Chen, J. (2024). Prospect theory: What it is and how it works, with examples. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/prospecttheory.asp
5. Corporate Finance Institute. (2023). Decision theory. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/career-map/sell-side/capital-markets/decision-theory/
6. Encyclopedia Britannica | Britannica. (2024). Deterrence definition & meaning. Britannica dictionary. https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/deterrence
7. Deutscher, C., Dimant, E., & Humphreys, B. R. (2017). Match fixing and sports betting in football: Empirical evidence from the German Bundesliga. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2910662
8. Ellemers, N. (2017). Social identity theory | Definition, history, examples, & facts. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/social-identity-theory
9. Etuk, R., Xu, T., Abarbanel, B., Potenza, M. N., & Kraus, S. W. (2022). Sports betting around the world: A systematic review. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 11(3), 689–715. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2022.00064
10. Fan, H. (2024). A Critical Comparison of SEUT and Prospect Theory. In Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Management Research and Economic Development, 72, 2754–1177. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/72/20240690
11. Giel, T., Dallmeyer, S., Memmert, D., & Breuer, C. (2023). Corruption and self-sabotage in sporting competitions – An experimental approach to match-fixing behavior and the influence of deterrence factors. Journal of Sports Economics, 24(4), 497–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/15270025221134239
12. Gray, S. J., & Porreca, R. (2024). Explaining elite athletes’ corruption behaviours: A comparative analysis of doping and match fixing. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 16(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2023.2290118
13. Han, S. (2020). Match-fixing under the state monopoly sports betting system: A case study of the 2011 K-League scandal. Crime, Law and Social Change, 74(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-020-09888-0
14. Johnson, B. (2019). Do Criminal Laws Deter Crime? Deterrence Theory in Criminal Justice Policy: A Primer. Minnesota House of Representatives. https://www.house.mn.gov/hrd/pubs/deterrence.pdf
15. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory. An analysis of decision-making under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada045771
16. Kihl, L. (2019). Individual-level explanations of corruption within an intercollegiate context. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 12(1), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.17161/jis.v12i1.11560
17. LaMorte, W. W. (2022). The theory of planned behavior. MPH Online Learning Modules. https://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/mph-modules/sb/behavioralchangetheories/BehavioralChangeTheories3.html
18. Misamore, B. (2018). How Google & Apple approach the principal-agent problem. HBS online. Business Insights Blog. https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/apple-google-principle-agent-problem
19. Oxford-review.com. (n.d.). Moral Disengagement. https://oxford-review.com/oxford-review-encyclopaedia-terms/moral-disengagement/
20. Mravec, L. (2024). Sports Betting as a Threat to Sport. FairPlay: Revista de Filosofía, Ética y Derecho del Deporte, 25, 30–51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392699810_Sports_betting_as_a_threat_to_sport
21. National Cancer Institute. (2024). NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms. https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/socioeconomic-status
22. Nickerson, C. (2023). Rational choice theory: What it is in economics, with examples. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/rational-choice-theory.html
23. Statista.com. (2024). Sports Betting – Worldwide. Statista market forecast. https://www.statista.com/outlook/amo/online-gambling/online-sports-betting/worldwide
24. Roberts, R., & Flin, R. (2019). Best practices for the introduction of new technologies: Investigating the psychological dimension. Work Package 1: Literature Review. Researchgate.com. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337168074
25. Spacey, J. (2024). 27 Examples of Socioeconomic Factors. Simplicable.com. https://simplicable.com/society/socioeconomic-factors
26. Statista.com. (2024). Sports – Worldwide. Statista market forecast. https://www.statista.com/outlook/amo/sports/worldwide
27. Šukys, S. (2013). Athletes’ justification of cheating in sport: Relationship with moral disengagement in sport and personal factors. Ugdymas, Kūno Kultūra, Sportas, 3(90), 70. https://doi.org/10.33607/bjshs.v3i90.171
28. Tuenrat, Y., & Alamanos, E. (2023). Cognitive dissonance theory: A review. In S. Papagiannidis (Ed.), TheoryHub Book. https://open.ncl.ac.uk/theories/7/cognitive-dissonance-theory/
29. Van Der Hoeven, S., De Waegeneer, E., Constandt, B., & Willem, A. (2020). Match-fixing: Moral challenges for those involved. Ethics & Behavior, 30(6), 425–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2019.1667238
30. Wu, Q., Bayer, R., & Lenten, L. J. (2020). Conditional pension funds to combat cheating in sporting contests: Theory and experimental evidence. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 89, 101537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101537
31. Wertz, S. K. (1981). The varieties of cheating. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 8(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.1981.9714373
32. Zaksaite, S. (2024). The Interrelation of Micro and Macro Factors That Contribute to Cheating in Sports. Sport&EU Review, 4(2), 9–23.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Žilvinas Muraška, Audrius Šimkus

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.